New questions arose as new evidence emerged in the plane crash

New questions arose as new evidence emerged in the plane crash

New evidence in the PIA plane crash raises new questions. Why didn't the pilot respond to the ATC's three-fold elevation? Why the ATC guidelines were violated despite three warnings?
According to the investigation, the plane was supposed to be at an altitude of 1680 feet at a distance of 5 miles from the runway. According to the equipment installed on the runway, the plane was flying at 3500 feet at that time.The website's flight radar also confirmed that the plane was at high altitude. At such an altitude, the plane was unstable at the time of landing.
Why didn't the pilot use the RAM air turbine when the engines failed? 
One of the possibilities is to forget to open the landing gear in an attempt to stay in the air by raising the nose of the plane.
The engine of the plane rubbed after which the engines are likely to fail.
According to flight radar, the plane came down less than 275 feet before crashing. Images of the plane show clear signs of damage to the lower parts of the engines. Collisions are unusual and rare.
There is a possibility that the main cause of PIA accidents is the mafia inside the organization.
Employees in each department have their own associations, which act as pressure groups. All associations create barriers to official and administrative affairs. The pilots' organization PALPA is approved by political parties. Having passed matriculation, they have become pilots on salaries of lakhs of rupees. Relatives are in important positions. Civil aviation inspectors are prevented from accompanying them for simulator training.
Palpa General Secretary Narejo is currently the PIA's training rating instructor. PIA pilots have been flouting safety measures in the past.
 Plane crashes in Panjgur and Gilgit were pilots' fault. The planes were damaged.